Kate Middleton title: Duchess could have rejected wedding gift from Queen Elizabeth II | Royal | News (Reports)

0
76

Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, 38, and Prince William, 38, are future heads of the Royal Family and are much-valued working royals. In keeping with royal tradition, Queen Elizabeth II, 94, presented Prince William with the dukedom of Cambridge upon his marriage to Kate and they have been known as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge ever since.

Kate’s full royal title is HRH (Her Royal Highness) the Duchess of Cambridge but through her marriage to William, she is also a Princess of the United Kingdom.

While Kate continues to be known as the Duchess of Cambridge she could have requested a different style from the Queen had she wanted a different title, a constitutional expert has claimed.

READ  Brexit news: Philip Hammond and Sajid Javid 'fight' over free movement | Politics | News - UK

Expert Iain MacMarthanne explained the fluid nature of the styles royal wives inherit through their husbands and claimed they are at liberty to still be known by their maiden names if they so wish.

Explaining their right to request a new style from the Queen, Mr MacMarthanne said: “The duchess holds her styles and titles as a courtesy, derived from her husband.”

READ MORE: Princess Charlotte and Kate’s fashion choice leaves experts baffled

READ  Gas goes green as UK takes another step toward net zero

Mr MacMarthanne added: “It would be unusual for it to be given to Prince Louis in time.

“The passing of a title to a younger son, as is being contemplated with the dukedom of Edinburgh is to keep that title alive, which otherwise would itself eventually become merged with the crown with Charles becoming king.

Kate will be known as William’s consort when he is king and while she will share his rank and status she will not hold the same political and constitutional powers as her husband.

READ  Brexit news: Theresa May set for DEFEAT as Remainers claim 'we have the numbers!' | Politics | News - UK

Mr MacMarthanne said:  “Historically, and generally, consorts were female. Kings ruled politically and militarily, and held sovereign power.

“Their consorts might have aided and supported their spouses role but their primary duty was to produce legitimate heirs.

“Unless required sovereign power was never shared between a ruler and their consort. In short it was a mater of expediency and ensuring a satisfactory command structure.

“Despite monarchy moving from being absolute to constitutional this sensibility has never changed.

“There can be only one sovereign, holding and dispensing sovereign power, unless at the will of Parliament.”

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.