Brexit: Mayor says riots over second referendum would be WORTH IT | Politics | News – UK



The Labour politician today said that he would support a second referendum on the Brexit vote as a last resort to prevent Britain crashing out of the EU without an agreement.

He said despite risks a second say on whether Britain should leave the EU could result in social unrest as well as deepening divisions in British society, he would still push for it.

Mr Burnham also added that it was “alt-right” activists that were pushing for a no deal agenda in order exploit a divide between Britons that wanted a hard Brexit and a soft one.

He risked further infuriating Brexiteers by arguing that if Britain was heading towards a no-deal Brexit it should be up to Brussels to cancel the March 2019 deadline to allow time for further negotiations.

Should a deal fail, Brexit should be cancelled, Mr Burnham said.

He said: “I have to think seriously about what a second vote would mean on the streets of Greater Manchester.

“If we thought the first was bad, the second would be a whole lot worse.

“It won’t heal divisions but widen them, it would be angrier, create social unrest and open up a massive opportunity for the populist far right in a way we are seeing elsewhere in Europe and the USA.”

Eurosceptic Mr Burnham also said right-wingers were driving their own agenda in order to “set up a clash in our communities from which they think they can profit”.

Despite his comments, Mr Burnham said he did not support the People’s Vote campaign which also called for a second Brexit referendum, but said that he did support a second ballot only in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

He said: “ A price would undoubtedly be paid in terms of social cohesion but it would be a necessary one to avoid the damage to people’s jobs, families and lives.”

Mr Burnham acknowledged that a second vote “would cause real division on our streets, but there is only one thing worse than that and that is crashing out of the EU without a deal”.

He said: “I think a second vote would further erode trust in Parliament and politicians and there is always a price that comes with that, but in the end that price is worth paying to stop the catastrophic damage to jobs that would come with a no-deal Brexit.”

Mr Burnham also said the June 2016 referendum was as much an “instruction for Westminster to review its relationship with the rest of England” as a message to the bloc.

He said: “If the phrase ‘take back control’ is to mean anything, it must mean substantial devolution of power and resources out of Westminster to all of the English regions.”

Today, Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab faced more pressure to secure a deal after being ridiculed by former Bank of England governor Mervyn King, who condemned the Government’s “incompetence” in securing an agreement with the EU.

Lord King said it “beggars belief” Theresa May’s cabinet are talking about stockpiling food and medicines when Britain is the sixth-biggest economy in the world.

He said: “Frankly, if a government cannot take action to prevent some of these catastrophic outcomes, whatever position you take on the EU, it illustrates a whole lack of preparation.

“It doesn’t tell us anything about whether the policy of staying in the EU is good or bad, it tells us everything about the incompetence of the preparation for it.”

A Department for Exiting the European Union spokesman said: “As a result of the significant progress made in negotiations, we remain confident we will agree a mutually advantageous deal with the EU.”



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.